149
149
Mar 1, 2011
03/11
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 149
favorite 0
quote 0
in china, its $4,500. we wish them better, but just to put this in perspective, it's important to know where we stand now, the platform from which we now offer eight, and why if we do the right things we have an overwhelming prospect, an overwhelming prospect, to not only recover here in the united states, but leading the world in the 21st century. the man i'm about to introduce to you shares your view. americans have never settled for number two, literally. this is not hyperbole. it's not one of these chauvinistic things. we what other nations to do well, we will do better if they do well. but we are not -- we are not prepared, nor are you, to settle for being number two in anything. and so, folks, that's why we've laid out -- the president has laid out in his state of the union speech the need for us to innovate. we have the most innovative economy in the world. we have the freest of the free enterprise systems. we know what we are doing. we want to unleash the free enterprise system. we also know that w
in china, its $4,500. we wish them better, but just to put this in perspective, it's important to know where we stand now, the platform from which we now offer eight, and why if we do the right things we have an overwhelming prospect, an overwhelming prospect, to not only recover here in the united states, but leading the world in the 21st century. the man i'm about to introduce to you shares your view. americans have never settled for number two, literally. this is not hyperbole. it's not one...
132
132
Mar 15, 2011
03/11
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 132
favorite 0
quote 0
i met with stephen palmer head of microsoft when he was in town and the present of china was here. they talk about those issues in stranded revenues offshore. you have to make a decision to expand somewhere. do you do it where the money is or pay a penalty to bring it back here and expanded here? it is hard to go your shareholders who you are obligated to take care of them
i met with stephen palmer head of microsoft when he was in town and the present of china was here. they talk about those issues in stranded revenues offshore. you have to make a decision to expand somewhere. do you do it where the money is or pay a penalty to bring it back here and expanded here? it is hard to go your shareholders who you are obligated to take care of them
128
128
Mar 14, 2011
03/11
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 128
favorite 0
quote 0
-- need to go to compete with china and other global competitors. as a top republican voice in congress, what's your take on this issue and the remoney cuts -- republican cuts specifically? is. >> guest: so here's the problem we face. first of all, you have to step back because nobody in 112 years -- 12 years ever came through my door and said, cut my spending. we have to be able to prioritize what it is that this country needs to move forward and create jobs and innovate and all that. i actually am a fan of research. i've supported nih research, supported investments in new technologies through some of the energy bills and all, and i think it's important. we have to look in the context of where's the money coming from and where's it going, and what are we getting for it as we did when we reauthorized nih and reorganized to say how do we maximize and create better communication and partnerships? without getting into the specifics because, frankly, i don't know the dollar per dollar what he's proposing versus what we're proposing, the second piece of
-- need to go to compete with china and other global competitors. as a top republican voice in congress, what's your take on this issue and the remoney cuts -- republican cuts specifically? is. >> guest: so here's the problem we face. first of all, you have to step back because nobody in 112 years -- 12 years ever came through my door and said, cut my spending. we have to be able to prioritize what it is that this country needs to move forward and create jobs and innovate and all that. i...
165
165
Mar 19, 2011
03/11
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 165
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> there are different rules in the eu, china, iran. >> is certainly, regulation that is pure randomness because of government behavior is a deterrent. but things change all the time. i think the notion that, setting forth the framework, there are different sorts of things that could be changed. for example, the neutrality principles that were set up by colin powell at the time, i did not think a lot of sense. i did not think they had a lot of teeth, so i was not in favor of them. move forward a few years, and everybody basically agrees. you should not be able to attach devices that would hurt. you should have a choice. these are principles everyone sort of accepted. the question then is, what do you do beyond that? i think the fcc is attempting to move forward. i think it is an ongoing dialogue. i think they have a role to play. i am not terribly comfortable with the original fcc rule on nondiscrimination because i did not think it was ultimately enforceable and i think it ultimately gets you into a whole lot of other problems. it raises more questions than it answers. what a specialize
. >> there are different rules in the eu, china, iran. >> is certainly, regulation that is pure randomness because of government behavior is a deterrent. but things change all the time. i think the notion that, setting forth the framework, there are different sorts of things that could be changed. for example, the neutrality principles that were set up by colin powell at the time, i did not think a lot of sense. i did not think they had a lot of teeth, so i was not in favor of them....
214
214
Mar 12, 2011
03/11
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 214
favorite 0
quote 0
president obama says that is the exact opposite way that we need to go to compete with china and other global competitors. as a top republican voice in congress, what is your take on this issue? >> here is a problem that we face. first of all, you have to step back. nobody in 12 years ever came through the door and said cut my spending. they say cut yours, cut yours, but they never say cut mine. we have to prioritize what it is that this country needs to move forward and create jobs. i actually am and a fan of research. i think it is important. we have to look at where the money is coming from, where is going, and what are we getting for it. we need to look nih and reorganize it a bit to see how we maximize the partnerships. i will not get into specifics because i do not know the dollar for dollar of what he is proposing versus what we are proposing. the second piece to remember is that in the last congress when the budget was passed, for the first time since 1974, up we did not pass a budget. a continuing resolution got us to march 4th, but not for the fiscal year. that is the first t
president obama says that is the exact opposite way that we need to go to compete with china and other global competitors. as a top republican voice in congress, what is your take on this issue? >> here is a problem that we face. first of all, you have to step back. nobody in 12 years ever came through the door and said cut my spending. they say cut yours, cut yours, but they never say cut mine. we have to prioritize what it is that this country needs to move forward and create jobs. i...
81
81
Mar 22, 2011
03/11
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 81
favorite 0
quote 0
., china, iran. >> certainly, regulatory uncertainty, pure randomness is a deterrent to investment. you know, there's nothing certain, and we change things all the time. i think that the notion that, you know, setting forth a framework, there's different sorts of things that can be changed. for example, the net neutrality principles that were spoused by colin powell at the time i didn't think at at time that made sense or had a lot of teeth. i wasn't in favor of them. go forward a few years, you find those principles everybody agrees with. nobody came out and said basically people shouldn't have access to use content that is legal, that they shouldn't be able to attach devices that wouldn't hurt the thing, and they should have choice. everybody accepted that. the question then is what do you do beyond that? i think the fcc in december's order was attempting to move forward. i think that's an ongoing dialogue. i think the fcc has a role to play in it. i was sort of not terribly comfortable with the original, for example, fcc rules an nondiscrimination ultimately because i didn't thin
., china, iran. >> certainly, regulatory uncertainty, pure randomness is a deterrent to investment. you know, there's nothing certain, and we change things all the time. i think that the notion that, you know, setting forth a framework, there's different sorts of things that can be changed. for example, the net neutrality principles that were spoused by colin powell at the time i didn't think at at time that made sense or had a lot of teeth. i wasn't in favor of them. go forward a few...
153
153
Mar 21, 2011
03/11
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 153
favorite 0
quote 0
., china, iran -- >> guest: ercertainly pure randomness on the part of government behavior is a deterrent to investment like almost anything is. but there's nothing that's certain, and we change things all the time. i think the notion that, you know, setting forth a framework, there are different sorts of things that could be changed. for example, the net neutrality principles that were espoused by colin powell, at the time i didn't think that made a whole lot of sense, and i didn't think that actually they had a lot of teeth, so i wasn't in favor of them. roll forward a number of years, and you find those principles, everybody agrees with. nobody's come out and said, basically, people shouldn't have an access to used content that is legal, they shouldn't be able to attach devices that wouldn't hurt the thing, and they shouldn't have choice. those basic principles, everybody sort of accepted. the question then is, what grow do -- what do you do beyond that? and i think the fcc, you know, with december order, i think, was attempting to move forward. i think that's an ongoing dialogue. i th
., china, iran -- >> guest: ercertainly pure randomness on the part of government behavior is a deterrent to investment like almost anything is. but there's nothing that's certain, and we change things all the time. i think the notion that, you know, setting forth a framework, there are different sorts of things that could be changed. for example, the net neutrality principles that were espoused by colin powell, at the time i didn't think that made a whole lot of sense, and i didn't think...